Reprinted with full non-expiring permission from GPTdeepfake.com

In recent weeks, major tech companies have taken significant steps to address the growing problem of explicit deepfakes, potentially signaling a shift in the industry’s approach to this issue. This comes after sustained criticism from digital safety experts, women’s rights advocates, and legal scholars regarding Big Tech’s perceived role in the proliferation of non-consensual, sexually-explicit deepfakes online.

Meta’s Oversight Board ruled on two cases involving AI-generated explicit images of public figures, mandating their removal and recommending policy clarifications. The Board emphasized the severity of harms caused by such content and suggested replacing vague terms in content moderation policies with clearer language.

Microsoft published a report acknowledging the scale of the deepfake problem and calling for updated legislation to protect citizens from abusive AI-generated content. The company’s vice chair and president, Brad Smith, advocated for criminal penalties for creating and distributing non-consensual intimate images and child sexual abuse material generated by AI.

Google announced significant updates to its search engine to combat explicit deepfakes. These changes include overhauling the reporting process for victims and adjusting the search algorithm to push websites hosting deepfake pornography further down in search results. The company aims to surface high-quality, non-explicit content for queries specifically seeking this type of material.

While these developments have been welcomed by advocates fighting against image-based sexual abuse, it remains to be seen whether they will lead to better protections for victims and a reduction in the volume of such material online. However, these actions suggest that the tech giants are beginning to take the criticisms seriously and may be moving towards more comprehensive measures to address the deepfake abuse epidemic.

Original Article

SEO Keywords: KOSA, online safety, censorship, child protection, internet regulation, data privacy, social media, free speech, digital rights, parental control

The domain name COPIEDACT.com is for sale. Contact admin@tweeted.com

The Kids Online Safety Act (KOSA) has passed the Senate with overwhelming bipartisan support, alongside the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Action (COPPA) 2.0. These bills aim to regulate data collection from minors and control platform features that could harm children’s mental health. However, the legislation has faced criticism from various quarters.

Critics, including Senators Ron Wyden, Rand Paul, and Mike Lee, argue that KOSA could stifle free speech and potentially censor content beyond its intended scope. Concerns have been raised about the bill’s vague definition of “mental health disorder” and the potential for overreach in content regulation.

Child safety advocates and some tech platforms support KOSA, viewing it as a necessary step to ensure social media is “safe by design” for young users. However, opposition groups, including the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and hundreds of students, have protested against the bill. They argue that it could threaten privacy, reduce access to vital online resources, and limit free speech for all internet users.

The bill now heads to the House of Representatives, where it faces significant challenges. With limited time left in the legislative session and substantial opposition in the House, KOSA’s future remains uncertain. Some lawmakers prefer a broader online privacy law that would protect all users, not just children.

Critics suggest that alternative approaches, such as addressing Big Tech’s overall impact or relying on parental guidance, might be more effective in protecting children online. As the debate continues, the balance between online safety and preserving internet freedoms remains a contentious issue.

SEO Keywords: KOSA, online safety, censorship, child protection, internet regulation, data privacy, social media, free speech, digital rights, parental control

The domain name COPIEDACT.com is for sale. Contact admin@tweeted.com

Four prominent U.S. Senators have released a roadmap for artificial intelligence regulation, proposing an annual investment of at least $32 billion for non-defense AI innovation. The AI Working Group, comprising Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY), Mike Rounds (R-SD), Martin Heinrich (D-NM), and Todd Young (R-IN), developed this proposal after months of AI Insight Forums featuring industry executives, academics, and civil rights leaders.

The 20-page report outlines key areas for Senate committees to focus on regarding AI regulation. These include AI workforce training, addressing AI-generated content in sensitive areas like child sexual abuse material and election content, protecting private information and copyrighted content, and mitigating AI’s energy costs. The roadmap is not intended as comprehensive legislation but as a guide for committees crafting regulations.

The proposal encourages lawmakers to work with the Senate Appropriations Committee to increase AI funding to levels recommended by the National Security Commission on Artificial Intelligence. This funding would support AI and semiconductor research across government agencies and the National Institute of Standards and Technology’s testing infrastructure.

Notably, the roadmap does not call for immediate safety evaluations of all AI systems before public release, instead suggesting the development of a framework to determine when such evaluations are necessary. It also refrains from proposing an overhaul of existing copyright rules, instead asking policymakers to consider if new legislation is needed in areas like transparency and content provenance.

Reactions to the roadmap have been mixed. While some industry representatives view it as an encouraging start, others criticize its high costs and lack of immediate, enforceable regulations. Civil rights groups express concerns about potential power consolidation in AI infrastructure providers and the need for stronger guardrails to prevent harm to marginalized communities.

As various AI-related bills advance through Senate committees, the effectiveness and speed of implementing these regulatory proposals remain uncertain, especially given the complexities of AI technology and the approaching election year.

View Full Report Here

The domain name COPIEDACT.com is for sale. Contact admin@tweeted.com

  In it’s present form, the Bill is 18 pages long. Can you give me a 500 word summary of the bill and suggest some keywords for SEO?

Certainly. Here’s a 500-word summary of the bill, followed by 10 SEO keywords:

The “Content Origin Protection and Integrity from Edited and Deepfaked Media Act of 2024” is a comprehensive legislation aimed at addressing the challenges posed by artificial intelligence-generated content, deepfakes, and content provenance in the digital age. The bill recognizes the increasing difficulty in assessing the nature, origins, and authenticity of digital content that has been algorithmically generated or modified, and seeks to establish frameworks to mitigate these issues.

At its core, the bill mandates transparency and protection measures for digital content. It requires tools used for creating synthetic or synthetically-modified content to provide users with the ability to include content provenance information. This information, which documents the origin and history of digital content, is intended to be machine-readable and difficult to remove or alter.

The legislation tasks the Under Secretary of Commerce for Standards and Technology with establishing a public-private partnership to develop standards for content provenance information technologies and the detection of synthetic and synthetically-modified content. This includes facilitating the development of guidelines for watermarking, content provenance information, and synthetic content detection across various media types.

The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) is given a key role in research and public education. NIST is required to conduct research on technologies for detecting synthetic content and carry out public education campaigns about synthetic content and deepfakes. This aims to enhance public awareness and understanding of these emerging technologies and their potential impacts.

The bill introduces several prohibitions to protect content integrity. It makes it unlawful to knowingly remove or tamper with content provenance information for deceptive purposes. Covered platforms, which include major websites and applications, are generally prohibited from removing or disabling content provenance information, with some exceptions for security research. Additionally, the non-consensual use of covered content with provenance information for AI training or generating synthetic content is prohibited, aiming to protect the rights of content creators.

Enforcement of the Act is multi-faceted. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is given primary enforcement authority, treating violations as unfair or deceptive acts or practices. State attorneys general are also empowered to bring civil actions for violations, providing an additional layer of enforcement. Furthermore, the bill allows for private right of action, enabling individuals or entities who own covered content to bring civil actions against those who violate the Act’s provisions.

The legislation sets out potential relief for successful plaintiffs, including declaratory or injunctive relief, compensatory damages, and reasonable litigation expenses. It also establishes a four-year statute of limitations for bringing actions under the Act.

Importantly, the bill includes a rule of construction clarifying that it does not impair or alter the rights of copyright owners under any other applicable law. This ensures that existing copyright protections remain intact alongside the new provisions introduced by this Act.

Overall, this legislation represents a significant effort to address the challenges posed by AI-generated content and deepfakes. It aims to promote transparency, protect content integrity, and provide mechanisms for enforcement in an increasingly complex digital landscape.

SEO Keywords: Artificial Intelligence Regulation, Deepfake Detection, Content Provenance, Synthetic Media, Digital Content Protection, AI Transparency, Watermarking Technology, Content Authenticity, Cybersecurity Standards, Digital Copyright Protection 

Find PDF of full context of the Bill Here

The domain name COPIEDACT.com is for sale. Contact admin@tweeted.com